Fri 21 Jul 2006
If you are like me (pity for you) you know little about the life and career of James Garfield beyond the received wisdom that all good Ephs garner in the form of trivia-cum-school-pride. One among that faceless clutter of Gilded Age presidents, assassinated too soon to leave a mark on the nation, Garfield has seeped as deeply into historical anonymity as someone who once served in the highest office possibly can. As alums of Williams we can add a little bit to his biography if Garfield comes up in conversation — “he was assassinated on his way to an alumni reunion at Williams!” we can helpfully add when the twentieth president comes up as a topic of discussion — but seriously, how often does that happen? I’m a professional historian, albeit not of the Gilded Age, and I knew little beyond the rudiments before today.
My guess is that few of you are inclined to dig deep into the library to find the latest Garfield scholarship. But Times Books has a useful series, edited by the estimable Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., “The American Presidents.” The books are short and readable, geared toward a broad audience (well, as broad an audience as biographies of most presidents are likely to receive), but not without merit for students and scholars. Ira Rutkow, clinical professor of surgery at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey and an accomplished scholar of medical history, has written James A. Garfield for the series. Because of its accessibility, brevity, and readability, it is worth the space on your bookshelf.
The section on Garfield’s time at Williams is of necessity brief, but it reveals how important his time in Williamstown was to the future president’s development. Mark Hopkins plays a prominent role during Garfield’s tenure at the school (truncated not, as some legends have it, simply because he did not graduate, but rather because he had spent two years at what would later become Hiram College in Ohio before heading to the Purple Valley and graduating from the college in August 1856) and fingered Garfield for future greatness. The burly Ohioan was renowned as the finest debater not only of his, but perhaps of any era at Williams. He also served as chief editor of the literary magazine Williams Quarterly, was president of the school’s litarary club (the Philologian Society), was involved with the Theological Society, took leading roles in both the campus anti-secret society and the anti-fraternity faction, and won class salutatorian. On his graduation day he gave the college’s “Metaphysical Oration,” a high honor. (See p. 9.)
Garfield quickly rose to prominence in politics, first in Ohio, then, after an interregnum in which he served as a General in the Union Army, at the national level — it was at Williams that the theretofore disengaged Garfield took an interest in politics. Garfield eventually reached the highest ranks of government during an era in which the Republican Party was deeply divided.
Unsurprisingly, Rutkow is at his best in dealing with the medical issues surrounding Garfield’s utterly avoidable death at the hands of Charles Guiteau, well known to those conversant in the thumbnail sketch as a “frustrated office seeker,” but who was also reacting to the divide within the Grand Old Party. Rutkow shows how a combination of negligence, hubris, and ignorance led to Garfield’s death seventy-nine days after he took two bullets in the train station from which he was to head to Williams.
Garfield today hovers in the marginalia of American history, yet at the time his death was seen as a tragic loss to the Republic. Americans deeply mourned his death. Songs were written. (Johnny Cash sings a song devoted to Charlie Guiteau that I assume originates from the era.) Garfield’s tenure and subsequent assassination can be qualified as one of those great “what ifs?” in American history.
Rutkow’s book also, perhaps, will allow Williams folks to feel a bit more pride about our one contribution to the center of executive power on Pennsylvania Avenue (perhaps I am especially sensitive to this issue because, as a New Hampshire native, I am also shackled to Franklin Pierce, who was undoubtedly a failure as President). One of Garfield’s sons, Harry, would serve a long tenure as President of Williams; another, James, would serve as Secretary of the Interior under Teddy Roosevelt (indeed, his sacking in favor of a far less conservationally inclined successor would prove to be one of the reasons for the demise of William Howard Taft in the eyes of Progressives). But Garfield’s premature death does not place him in the category of failed presidencies, but rather of ones cut tragically short.


« Reflections upon Emergent Events | Partners » |
15 Responses to “Garfield Reconsidered”
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post
If a comment you submitted does not show up, please email us at eph at ephblog dot com. Please note that commenters are required to use a valid email address when submitting comments.
frank uible says:
Without research I remember that there is a large monument to President Garfield called the Garfield Memorial, located in Lakeview Cemetery and towering over the junction of the boundary lines of the cities of Cleveland, Cleveland Heights and East Cleveland. At one time, and I would not be surprised if continuing to today, the public during visiting hours established by the Cemetery could enter it, view Garfield memoribilia there and travel by elevator to its top floor (my quess – 100 feet in the air) where his Old Glory-draped casket rested. Now I will google Lakeview Cemetery and check on the accuracy of my ancient memory.
July 22nd, 2006 at 5:18 amfrank uible says:
Called James A. Garfield Monument. Lake View Cemetery. 55 meters high. Casket floor is not the very top one.
July 22nd, 2006 at 5:55 amDerek says:
Frank —
Thanks for this. I think just about all American Presidents have these sorts of memorials. In our constant concern about greatness, we forget that at some level, especially in their home towns, all of these men are seen as great, as embodying something worth celebrating. It’s why Presidential museums/libraries are so popular (and so contested). I think that was, to some extent, what I was getting at in my post, which is to say that we have our own contribution to this history and it is one of which we can be proud (though that should not mean uncritical, which tends to be one of the problems of memorialization).
In any case, next time I am in Cleveland, Lake View Cemetery will be on the itinerary — 55 meters — pretty impressive. I wonder if it seems garish or if it is appropriate.
dcat
July 22nd, 2006 at 12:07 pmfrank uible says:
Derek: If you care, google Lake View Cemetery. That will lead to photographs of the Monument – perhaps under “James A. Garfield Monument”. Also John D. Rockefeller and poor old Eliot Ness are buried there. Once I met Eliot, but that is a possible story for another day.
July 22nd, 2006 at 12:47 pmDerek says:
The whole place looks lovely, actually. Thanks.
dcat
July 22nd, 2006 at 1:37 pmfrank uible says:
You are welcome.
July 22nd, 2006 at 4:59 pmCole says:
In addition, Garfield has a proof of the Pythagorean Theorem attributed to him. If you’re interested, you can google “Garfield and the Pythagorean Theorem” and follow along. When I was interviewing for a math teaching vacancy, I had to teach a 9th grade honors geometry class and I used Garfield’s proof for my lesson and it went very well. You can see the lesson I followed along here- http://www.pbs.org/teachersource/mathline/concepts/president/activity2.shtm
July 23rd, 2006 at 1:12 pmDerek says:
President Garfield: Is there anything he couldn’t do?
dcat
July 23rd, 2006 at 4:06 pmLoweeel says:
[snarky]Derek — he couldn’t live after taking a few bullets[/snarky]
July 23rd, 2006 at 4:36 pmDerek says:
OK, so we now know that Loweel is going to hell! (He says, stifling giggles.)
July 23rd, 2006 at 6:03 pmjared '96 says:
I recently read Kenneth Ackerman’s “Dark Horse: The Surprise Election and Political Murder of President James A. Garfield.” I recommend it to anyone interested in the politics of the Gilded Age–it focuses more on the 1880 election and aftermath than on Garfield himself, but I found it fascinating. I didn’t realize that, unlike the other assassinated presidents, Garfield lived for several weeks after being shot. He died as much from gross medical negligence and bad luck as from Guiteau’s bullet.
July 23rd, 2006 at 8:52 pmDerek says:
I was going to mention that book — it is probably the most well known and well regarded book, certainly recently, on Garfield and his age. because his expertise is surgery, Rutkow especially emphasizes the circumstances regarding Garfield’s likely avoidable death.
dcat
July 23rd, 2006 at 9:26 pmJohn Phillips '02 says:
Yeah *you* feel shackled to Franklin Pierce. He was a direct ancestor of mine…
July 24th, 2006 at 2:39 pmLoweeel says:
John, the diversity of your ancestry never ceases to amaze me.
I think we really WERE the diverse candidates running for CC that year.
July 24th, 2006 at 2:54 pmDerek says:
Wow. yeah — that is shackled to Franklin Pierce. Oh well — even in that case, we need too keep in mind that a failed presidency does not have to be a failed life. Isn’t Pierce actually from Franklin or thereabouts? (Maybe you are not from NH or just choose not to know these things.)
July 24th, 2006 at 3:07 pm