- EphBlog - http://ephblog.com -

CSI: Update

Did anyone see the CSI episode with the Williams reference? It was entitle “Happenstance.” Key scene:

In the morgue, Warrick is taken aback when he sees the two women on gurneys, side by side. They wore the same toe nail polish, had the same watch on their wrists. Their causes of death are obvious, but Doc Robbins says Amanda died a few hours ahead of her sister. At least they didn’t share everything.

In his office, Grissom peruses a letter sent to him by a university, requesting his presence to teach a graduate seminar. Would he consider a sabbatical? Maybe… His reverie is broken by Catherine, who arrives to inform him, “Our two cases have become one.” Catherine is thinking Jill killed Amanda, then herself. It’s a simple murder-suicide. There were no visual connections between the twins; no photos of Amanda in Jill’s house, no phone numbers in each other’s phone books. So are the cases really connected?

The entire episode is available on the web. If I were technologically sophisticated, I would pull out the Williams scene and post the video at YouTube or at least a screen shot at Flickr. Can someone cool help us out? Note also a reference in the episode to a topic discussed here at EphBlog.

UPDATE: [by Eric]
Here is the inlined image as referenced below in the comments.

Comments Disabled (Open | Close)

Comments Disabled To "CSI: Update"

#1 Comment By Eric On November 21, 2006 @ 12:20 pm

Link to the image on Flickr, and below is an attempt to inline it into a comment, not sure if that will work.

#2 Comment By Eric On November 21, 2006 @ 12:22 pm

It appears that MT strips pictures out of comments – I will see if I can get it into the original post.

#3 Comment By Aidan On November 21, 2006 @ 1:37 pm

any reason that’s not the actual address? Someone needs to fire the fact-checkers!

#4 Comment By Anonymous On November 21, 2006 @ 7:21 pm

Or any reason why Williams would be looking for a scientist to teach a graduate level seminar?

#5 Comment By Laura ’92 On November 23, 2006 @ 1:50 pm

possibly the address is wrong on purpose?