Recall this New York Times article:
Alan Moldawer’s adopted twins, Matt and Andrew, had always thought of themselves as white. But when it came time for them to apply to college last year, Mr. Moldawer thought it might be worth investigating the origins of their slightly tan-tinted skin, with a new DNA kit that he had heard could determine an individual’s genetic ancestry. The results, designating the boys 9 percent Native American and 11 percent northern African, arrived too late for the admissions process. But Mr. Moldawer, a business executive in Silver Spring, Md., says they could be useful in obtaining financial aid.
And for getting into Williams!
“Naturally when you’re applying to college you’re looking at how your genetic status might help you,” said Mr. Moldawer, who knows that the twins’ birth parents are white, but has little information about their extended family. “I have three kids going now, and you can bet that any advantage we can take we will.”
Genetic tests, once obscure tools for scientists, have begun to influence everyday lives in many ways. The tests are reshaping people’s sense of themselves — where they came from, why they behave as they do, what disease might be coming their way.
It may be only natural then that ethnic ancestry tests, one of the first commercial products to emerge from the genetic revolution, are spurring a thorough exploration of the question, What is in it for me?
Quite a bit, at least in terms of admissions to elite colleges. The average combined SAT differential between African-American and Asian-American students at Williams is more than 230 points. Imagine that you are an ambitious high school senior with mid 600 SATs. Without a “hook,” you are highly unlikely to be admitted to Williams. Check the box marked African-American on the Common Application, and you improve your chances dramatically. How much do you really want to go to Williams?
Given the tests’ speculative nature, it seems unlikely that colleges, governments and other institutions will embrace them. But that has not stopped many test-takers from adopting new DNA-based ethnicities — and a sense of entitlement to the privileges typically reserved for them. Prospective employees with white skin are using the tests to apply as minority candidates, while some with black skin are citing their European ancestry in claiming inheritance rights.
Note that the Common Application gives you almost complete latitude in what boxes you check.
There is no requirement that you “look” African-American or that other people identify you as African-America. All that matters is how you “identify yourself.”
Now, one hopes, that there isn’t too much truth-stretching going on currently. The Admissions Department only wants to give preferences to students who really are African-American, who add to the diversity of Williams because their experiences provide them with a very different outlook than their non-African-American peers. But those experiences can only come from some identification — by society toward you and/or by you to yourself — over the course of, at least, your high school years. How can you bring any meaningful diversity if you never thought of yourself as African-American (or were so thought of by others) until the fall of senior year?
Driving the pursuit of genetic bounty are start-up testing companies with names like DNA Tribes and Ethnoancestry. For $99 to $250, they promise to satisfy the human hunger to learn about one’s origins — and sometimes much more. On its Web site, a leader in this cottage industry, DNA Print Genomics, once urged people to use it “whether your goal is to validate your eligibility for race-based college admissions or government entitlements.”
If you care about the traditional notion of diversity at Williams — that it is critical for the College to have enough African-American students, students who identify themselves this way and are so treated by society — than this phrasing must make your blood run cold. What happens when hundreds (thousands?) of students with 600 level SATs take these tests and “discover” that they are African-American?
Some social critics fear that the tests could undermine programs meant to compensate those legitimately disadvantaged because of their race. Others say they highlight an underlying problem with labeling people by race in an increasingly multiracial society.
“If someone appears to be white and then finds out they are not, they haven’t experienced the kinds of things that affirmative action is supposed to remedy,” said Lester Monts, senior vice provost for student affairs at the University of Michigan, which won the right to use race as a factor in admissions in a 2003 Supreme Court decision.
Still, Michigan, like most other universities, relies on how students choose to describe themselves on admissions applications when assigning racial preferences.
Up until now, we have all assumed (hoped) that applicants are mostly honest. The College does not check that you are “really” African-American or Hispanic. They take you at your word — although they certainly like to see club membership, essay/recommendation references and other signs consistent with that check-mark.
Yet what happens when every student at elite high schools gets tested? This will happen. Indeed, how can any social studies teacher resist such a test when it would serve as a great starting point for all sorts of amazing class discussions?
Then, once every junior at Exeter has taken the test, it will be time for some fun discussions in the college councilor’s office.
Uptight Parent: We would really like Johnny to go to Williams.
College Counselor: Well, Johnny is a great kid who will do well at Colby. But, with his grades and test scores, Williams would be quite a reach.
UP: If Johnny were African-American, he would get into Williams.
CC: Well, that might or might not be true, but it hardly seems relevant to this discussion since Johnny is white.
UP: But the project that Johnny did for social studies showed that he was 2% sub-Saharan African.
CC: So . . .
UP: That means that he can check the African-American box on the Common Application.
CC: Well, the traditional usage of that box is for students that have always identified themselves, and been identified by others, as African-American.
UP: But it doesn’t say that on the form, does it?
UP: So, Johnny can check it, right? There is no school policy against it?
UP: In fact, since the test demonstrates that, scientifically, Johnny is African-America, I can count on the school to verify that designation in all its application paperwork.
CC: Yes. [Sigh] And I hear that the fall foliage is lovely in the Berkshires . . .
Think that this is just more stupid EphBlog fantasy?
Ashley Klett’s younger sister marked the “Asian” box on her college applications this year, after the elder Ms. Klett, 20, took a DNA test that said she was 2 percent East Asian and 98 percent European. Whether it mattered they do not know, but she did get into the college of her choice. “And they gave her a scholarship,” Ashley said.
Of course, being “Asian” does not help you when applying Williams.
The point here is not that the current admissions policy at Williams is bad or good. It is what it is. The point is that there are significant preferences given to those who check certain boxes and that cheap genetic testing will provide many people with a plausible excuse to check boxes that, a few years ago, they did not have. How much will the admissions process change as a result?
I first wrote about this topic more than a decade ago. Were my fears justified then? Perhaps not. What about the next decade? Time will tell.
Note, however, the notable tightening over the last decade. Back then it was, “If you wish to be identified with a particular ethnic group, please check all that apply.” You didn’t even have to identify yourself as African-American (as you have to now), you just had to “wish to be identified.” A reader comments [screen shot from Common Ap added by me]:
There is an interesting parallel between colleges asking for full legal names and names of parents now (in 2017) vs them what was happening in 1920s. Back in 1920s, the colleges were asking for “full legal names of parents at birth”, mostly to figure out who was a Jewish person who changed their name to “pass” as a gentile. Currently, my guess is that the common application is asking for full names and places of birth of parents (again this is a recent addition to common application) primarily to:
– figure out whites who are trying to “pass” as Hispanic
– figure out Asians who are trying to “pass” as White
Comments on how much of an issue this is today? (Please save debate about what Williams policy should be for another thread. I am most interested in reports on what applicants are doing now and/or what you recommend that they do.)