Wed 4 Apr 2018
President Maud Mandel, 3
Posted by David Dudley Field '25 under Maud Mandel at 6:37 am
Brown Dean of the College Maud Mandel begins her term as the 18th president of Williams on July 1. EphBlog welcomes her! We are pro-Mandel and hope that her presidency is successful. (Full disclosure, our preference would have been for an internal candidate like Lee Park or Eiko Siniawer.) Let’s spend some time discussing what we know about Mandel so far. Day 3.
From the College’s news release:
As dean at Brown, Mandel has been deeply involved in efforts to advance diversity and inclusion, including promoting programs to foster retention for historically underrepresented students in the STEM fields. She also led a collaborative process with students and staff to open the First-Generation College and Low-Income Student Center (FLi Center), the first center at any Ivy League school to be dedicated to first-generation students.
…
A strong proponent of the liberal arts, Mandel established the Brown Learning Collaborative, aimed at strengthening student learning in the core competencies of a liberal arts education, including writing, reading, research, data analysis, problem-solving and public speaking.
Most of the news release is the sort of fluff that we would expect in such an announcement. Mandel is wonderful! Williams is wonderful! We will all be even more wonderful together! The above paragraphs are the only substance. Possibilities:
1) Jim Reische is filling space with whatever material he has at hand. Those activities were part of Mandel’s CV, or at least the package that search firm Spencer Stuart prepared for her as they shopped her around the presidential market. But they aren’t, really, important to her or to the Williams search committee that selected her. They tell us little/nothing about what to expect over the next few years.
2) These achievements were among the primary reasons that the search committee selected Mandel. They felt that Williams was not doing nearly enough about problems associated with URM under-representation in STEM (and/or the other items) and wanted a president who would make tackling them her highest priority.
3) These projects were truly important to Mandel. She wanted the job as dean precisely because she saw certain problems at Brown. She identified and fought for these improvements. Since every school, including Williams, can do better along these dimensions, these will be her highest priorities as Williams president.
My guess is that 2) is not true. Virtually every dean/provost at every elite college/university can point to similar projects/achievements. Mandel’s tenure as Dean is completely typical in that regard. So, it is unlikely that these played a meaningful role in her selection. (I would feel otherwise if she had done something unusual and/or if the search committee signaled us more clearly. For example, if Mandel had come from Harvey Mudd it might have been because the search committee wanted Williams to create an engineering major.)
I don’t have a sense of how much Mandel truly cared about these projects at Brown — I am sure she was in favor, but were they the source of her passion for the job? — or how much of these she will bring to Williams.
What do readers think?
Print
• Email
| « Williams Reads Book Announcement and 2019-2020 Book Selection | President Maud Mandel, 4 » |
2 Responses to “President Maud Mandel, 3”
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post
If a comment you submitted does not show up, please email us at eph at ephblog dot com. Please note that commenters are required to use a valid email address when submitting comments.
ambrosius aurelianus says:
In another era, when the standards of public discourse required repeated invocations of the Trinity, it would’ve been a grave mistake to assume that everyone mentioning the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost was a theologian.
We’ve reached a similar point with our diversity pieties. Just look at Falk’s bio at the Sloane foundation, which lists his “commitment to student body diversity and inclusion” as a signal accomplishment of his presidency. I don’t think that’s quite how anyone at the college would read his tenure.
In general I think presidents are hired for a reason, and the only thing to say about the news release is that it’s not totally clear what that reason is. It’s striking that Mandel’s presidency will coincide with a great number of retirements among the faculty, and that she is herself a credentialed and respected academic (much more so than she is an administrator, with just four years as a college dean). Perhaps it was thought that having a scholar at the helm was the better half of caution in light of the upcoming turnover.
April 4th, 2018 at 9:46 amDoug says:
I have been involved with certain development projects at Williams now and again. My takeaway is this: the responsibility of the president, first and foremost, is to court major donors. I don’t think the average Eph understands how much of the president’s time is dedicated to these activities, or the extent of the administrative offices that underlie these activities. Whatever lofty goals Maud has coming into Williams will immediately become second to fundraising duties. Like AA said, it’s nice padding for a press release, but don’t expect major overhauls in URM recruiting to come from the president’s office. She’ll be too busy reading prospective donor reports and flying to California for cocktail parties.
April 4th, 2018 at 11:26 am