Given that this material, sent out to 300+ people, is essentially public, the College ought to just publish it on the web page for the Dean of the Faculty.
We look forward to seeing you at the first faculty meeting of the semester on September 12 at 4:00 p.m. in Griffin 3. At the end of the meeting, there will be a small reception in Griffin to welcome the new faculty.
The agenda and related materials are attached to this email.
The Faculty Steering Committee & Maud Mandel, President of the College
Sara Dubow (Chair), Division II
Colin Adams, Division III
Michelle Apotsos, Division I
Matt Carter, Division III
Aparna Kapadia, Division II
Amanda Wilcox, Division I
Notice anything interesting in the pdf?
I enjoyed this whine:
1. Apparently (?) some faculty complained that the tuition grant is not as generous as they had assumed because other colleges discount financial aid awards accordingly. Questions:
a) What is the current tuition grant? I have a vague memory that it is half of Williams tuition. Or is it half of whatever the tuition charge is?
b) Is this grant just for faculty or for all staff? If it is for everyone, that it must be pretty expensive. If it is just faculty, then how does the College get away with such a benefit? (My understanding is that any organization needs to be very careful when it makes benefits non-uniform across employees.)
c) How does the College handle this for employees who send their kids to Williams? The right approach is to treat all students/families the same.
2) I like the explicit statement that the College reserves the right to change/end this absurd program. (And note how unfair it is to faculty who either don’t have children and/or don’t send their children to college.) We ought to end it now, at least for new hires.
The best way to predict the behavior of Williams is to imagine that it run by a cabal of clever insiders, intent on milking the institution for everything they can, financially and otherwise. Further evidence:
It is bad enough that the College offers any mortgage assistance at all. What are we running? A bank? Faculty should borrow money just like the rest of us! But notice the increasing levels of sleaze here. It used to be that the College would only subsidize your primary residence. Now, you can have one house wherever you like — and, of course, it is pathetic that the College has faculty who reside elsewhere — and then the College will subsidize a second home for you in Williamstown.
Perhaps the good news is that, when the next financial crisis hits, there will be plenty of fat to cut . . .