Currently browsing posts filed under "Presidential Search"
Adam Falk, long may he reign, is the president of Williams. But who are the almost presidents? Approximately 40 people had serious interviews with members of the Presidential Search Committee. A handful of those might fairly be termed finalists. Who were they? I assume that Nancy Roseman had an interview, but, other than her, I am not sure who the internal candidates would have been. My sources have failed me on this. Comments?
Presumably, anyone named in the near future to the presidency of a liberal arts college would have had an interest in the Williams job, especially if they were an outsider. So, I bet that John Bravman, recently named Bucknell’s 17th president, was a (strong) candidate for the Williams job.
I am glad that we choose Falk instead. Are you?
Last night (Wednesday), I joined approximately 150-200 of my fellow alumni, parents, and friends of the NorCal Alumni Chapter to listen to Chair of the Trustees Greg Avis ’80, interim President Bill Wagner, and incoming President Adam Falk. I came away from the evening more impressed by each of them than I had been previously. Before I go any further, I should thank Chapter Prez Shannon Walsh ’03 for pulling together the inaugural edition of this roadshow they’ll be shopping around the country to other chapters. I know they were in LA tonight, will be in San Diego tomorrow (Friday) and in DC on Feb. 22nd, but I haven’t a clue when they’ll be elsewhere. This is a good reason to check out the events calendar on the alumni page and/or subscribe to your regional alumni email list.
And now on to the event…(you’ll have to go below the fold for the juicy details) Read more
An anonymous tipster David Kane tells us that Adam Falk of Johns Hopkins will be the new President of Williams College. I have no idea whatsoever if this is true.
From the JHU website:
Adam F. Falk became James B. Knapp Dean of the Krieger School of Arts and Sciences on Feb. 1, 2006. He had served in the position on an interim basis since January 2005.
Under his leadership, Falk said, the Krieger School’s goal remains what it has always been: “To be and remain the best small, research-intensive school of arts and sciences in the country; faculty member for faculty member and student for student, to be second to no other.”
Falk, a member of the Johns Hopkins physics faculty since 1994, was promoted to associate professor after only three years at Johns Hopkins and to full professor just three years later, in 2000. In 2002, he was appointed the Krieger School’s vice dean of faculty, a title that was changed to dean of faculty in 2004. He was instrumental in those positions in the formulation of the school’s strategic plan and in a comprehensive reform of appointment, promotion and tenure policies in the Krieger School.
Falk is a high-energy physicist whose research focuses on elementary particle physics and quantum field theory, particularly the interactions and decay of heavy quarks. He is a fellow of the American Physical Society and a winner of the Johns Hopkins Alumni Association Excellence in Teaching Award. Early in his career, he won prestigious national young investigator awards from both the National Science Foundation and the Energy Department.
He graduated with highest distinction from the University of North Carolina in 1987 and earned his Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1991, winning six awards for excellence in undergraduate teaching while a graduate student. He held post-doctoral appointments at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and the University of California, San Diego, before coming to Johns Hopkins.
hat tip to JeffZ for the idea (see previous post here)
It’s time, ephbloggers, for Williams to undergo a rare reformation by hiring a new President. Professor Macgregor Burns describes two types of leadership, transformational and transactional. What type of leader do we want for Williams? Why? And, more importantly, what questions would we pose to a Presidential candidate for Williams?
Also, to make the exercise more interesting, why not try to answer your own question were you a presidential candidate? I take a shot at it below
Ephblog, for better or for worse (or probably, a little bit of both) won’t have any influence on the hiring of the new Williams President. I propose, however, that we attempt to start a dialogue after he/she is hired by sending a collective list of ten (or so) questions about issues particular to Williams that have long bothered some portion of the Ephblog community. I propose that we keep the questions narrow and discrete in focus, rather than hitting on big picture stuff that will inevitably be discussed during the search process (e.g., how to deal with a lower endowment). I’ll start us off with an oft-expressed gripe recently raised in another thread:
(1) Is it problematic that the massive parking garage near Greylock Quad sits empty most of the time, and if so, will you push hard to allow students to utilize that parking in the 2009-2010 academic year?
Congratulations to Dr. Hans Giesecke ’78, the new President-Select of Greece’s Anatolia College. He begins his term in the fall.
Anatolia, founded in the Ottoman Empire by Boston Congregationalist missionaries in 1886 and uprooted in 1924 to Greece, today comprises the U.S. and European-accredited American College of Thessaloniki (ACT) and its graduate school of business, the Anatolia College preparatory school (an International Baccalaureate World School), and Anatolia Elementary. Almost 2500 students pursue their studies on its 45-acre campus overlooking the northern port city of Thessaloniki and the lofty peaks of Mt. Olympus.
Like Anatolia’s first President, Charles Tracy, Giesecke is a graduate of Williams College….
“For me it is no small coincidence that Anatolia still treasures its founding connection to the Haystack Movement, which was begun at Williams College in the early 19th Century. I hope to continue building on that special spirit of connectivity between North America and Greece during my service as Anatolia’s President,” says Giesecke.
At this mornings Ephraim Williams Society breakfast, Morty gave an update on the Presidential Search. First, the Search Committee is looking at 8-10 candidates in a serios fashion, checking resumes and so on. That seems consistent with the recent update:
The Committee has followed up on submitted names and held frequent conference calls to review the pool. We gathered in Williamstown yesterday to review our progress to date.
That progress, we are glad to report, has been substantial. We have held almost 40 meetings with potential candidates. Small teams representing each segment of our membership — students, trustees, faculty, and staff — have traveled across the country to talk personally with the men and women who aspire to lead Williams in the years ahead.
We will now conduct follow-up interviews with the most promising candidates prior to submitting the results of our work to the Board of Trustees, which has the responsibility of naming the next President.
As always, Morty is more forthcoming than official publications from the College.
Second, Morty (who is not involved in the process directly) reported that the Committee would probably reduce the pool to 2 or 3 finalists in the next “month or two.” Third, Morty mentioned that timing was always difficult to predict, but he thought that we might have an announcement before Septenber 1, with a start date for the new President of either September or next January.
1) I still hope that the Committee selects Cappy Hill ’76, for all the reasons given previously. But, given this news, I would say that Cappy’s appointment is somewhat less likely than it appeared 6 months ago. The key issue is timing. Cappy has only been president of Vassar for 3 years. If she leaves tomorrow, she is something of a bad person (depending in your point of view). One possibility is that the Commitee appoints her with a starting date of July 1, 2010. Giving Vassar 4 years (and an entire year to find a next President) is reasonable. If we haven ‘t heard anything before the fall, then the Committee might appoint her for July 1, 2011.
2) A sometimes knowledgeable alum writes:
What about trolling for the new president? You heard it here. Pam Carlton or Clayton Spencer. At best these would be neutral, one decidedly negative.
Who is Pam Carlton? I doubt that Williams would choose someone like Spencer ’77 without a Ph.D., despite her extensive experience in higher education. Spencer is on the Search Committee. Political junkies will recall that Dick Cheney went from leading George W. Bush’s search for a running mate to being the running mate.
Not that I am comparing Spencer to Cheney, of course. ;-)
3) I assume that Nancy Roseman is one of the 8-10 finalists. She is clearly interested in more senior jobs and it would be a serious insult for the Committee not to take her application seriously. I could also imagine her as one of the 2-3 finalists. Not because I think that Williams would ever choose her (that seems highly unlikely) but because a smart search committee stacks the finalists so that the whole board picks the candidate the search committee wants. Roseman was clearly just a stalking horse for the insider candidate for the Exeter job.
4) What other candidates are plausible?
A few points of needless opinion below the fold. Click Read more
To The Williams Community:
I am deeply honored to have been asked by the Board of Trustees to be
Interim President from July 1 until Morty Schapiro¹s successor assumes his
or her responsibilities. I feel privileged to be able to serve the College
in this capacity and look forward to continuing to collaborate with the
other members of Senior Staff, our regular standing committees, and the
Board of Trustees to manage College affairs and in particular to meet our
current financial challenges effectively and in ways that preserve our core
Over the course of the summer I will continue to carry out my
responsibilities as Dean of the Faculty. As Greg Avis pointed out in his
letter, should it become necessary for me to continue as Interim President
beyond September 1, Andrea Danyluk of the Computer Science Department and Division III representative on the Committee on Appointments and Promotions has generously agreed to serve as Acting Dean of the Faculty until I resume my responsibilities as Dean. In this event, Andrea would resign her position on the CAP and an election for a new Division III representative would take place at the September faculty meeting.
Let me take this opportunity to thank Morty on behalf of all of us for the
splendid leadership he continues to provide the College in these last months
of his presidency. I look forward in the coming months to working with all
members of the College community on our ongoing goal of making Williams the finest college it can be.
With best regards,
Dean of the Faculty
To the Williams Community,
At its recent meeting, the Board of Trustees received a report on the
presidential search, which is proceeding in an orderly and productive
manner. The community input process and the publishing of the presidential
position prospectus have been completed. The Presidential Search Committee is now focused on the parallel tasks of continuing to add names to the candidate list while researching and narrowing the field. As part of this process, delegations of committee members have been meeting with select candidates and will continue to do so.
The committee has been operating on the possibility of having the new
president in place by the time Morty Schapiro leaves at the end of June. The
chance of that has become remote enough to enact an alternative plan. In
anticipation of this possibility, the Board had charged its Executive
Committee with developing such a plan. The Executive Committee, after
deliberations and consultation with Morty, presented its recommendation to
I am very happy therefore to announce that the Board voted unanimously to
designate as Interim President Bill Wagner, Dean of the Faculty. He will
begin on July 1 and serve for as long as needed. Since the College Laws
indicate that, between presidencies, the Dean of Faculty would assume the
responsibilities of the President, this appointment is a natural
Williams is fortunate to be able to turn to someone as knowledgeable,
experienced, and respected as Bill. In addition to his service as Dean of
the Faculty, Bill has, in his 29 years at Williams, also served as Director
of the Williams-Exeter Programme and has chaired the Department of History,
the Committee on Educational Policy, Committee on Undergraduate Life,
Committee on Priorities and Resources, and Faculty Compensation Committee.
Please see the note from Bill that is attached below.
He will be supported by the College’s strong faculty governance structure
and exceptional administrative team. If the duties of Interim President turn
out to extend beyond September 1, Morty and Bill, in consultation with the
Faculty Steering Committee, have asked Andrea Danyluk, Professor of Computer Science, to serve as Acting Dean of the Faculty from that date until Bill could resume those responsibilities. She would bring to the task her own extensive experience in College governance, including as Chair of the Computer Science Department, Cognitive Science Program, Committee on Educational Policy, and Faculty Steering Committee and as member of the Committee on Appointments and Promotions.
The Board is confident that this arrangement will provide the College with
continuity and excellence in leadership until the next president takes
office. I hope you will join me in thanking Bill and Andrea for their
willingness to serve Williams in these capacities.
Greg Avis ’80
Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Trustees
Special thanks to “Aparent” for an update from the Williams College Presidential Search Committee.
“For those in the Williams community who are truly interested in the progress the Presidential Search Committee is reporting, here is the text of Thursday’s announcement:”
Milestones mapped; outreach meetings continue
February 19, 2009
To the Williams Community,
The Presidential Search Committee held its second in-person meeting in Williamstown on Thursday morning, February 12.
There were three primary objectives of the meeting. First, John Isaacson and Maggie Gilmore ’05 of search firm Isaacson, Miller helped the committee map out a tentative schedule of milestones and meetings. Second, President Schapiro addressed the committee, offering his insights into the Williams presidency and advice for us.
Wick applies for the Williams College presidency in today’s Inside Higher Ed column. Call me crazy, but I don’t see the board of trustees biting …
Latest news on the search for the next Williams President.
To the Williams Community,
I am happy to inform you of progress in the early stages of the presidential search process. The Board of Trustees has formed the 2009 Presidential Search Committee. Its student members were selected with the help of Dean Karen Merrill. I would also like to thank Bill Wagner, Dean of the Faculty, for his guidance. I will have the privilege of chairing the Committee, whose other members are:
Trustees: Valda Christian, David Coolidge, Michael Eisenson, Stephen Harty, Jonathan Kraft, Clayton Spencer
Faculty and Staff: Andrea Danyluk, Laurie Heatherington, Stephen Fix, Protik Majumder, David Pilachowski
Students: Alan Arias, Elizabeth Brickley
Alumni: Sarah Underhill, Christopher Giglio
Secretary: Charles Dew
As you can see from the attached background summaries, these individuals bring a wealth of involvement with and care for the College. The Committee is charged with identifying the candidates best suited to lead Williams and to present a short list of nominees to the Board of Trustees, which makes the final selection. Along the way, the Committee will solicit input from the broad Williams community, decide on selection of a search firm, develop a summary of the attributes we desire in our next President, and identify and screen candidates. Importantly, the process will draw on the College’s recent Self Study for Accreditation and 2020 Planning Process as well as on the sense of the College community to articulate the kind of leadership Williams now needs. The Committee will hold its first meeting later this month and, among other tasks, will weigh the most effective ways to engage the community in these important discussions.
We will operate on the possibility of having the new President in place by this summer. If at some point that appears unlikely, the Board will consider the options for an interim arrangement.
Thanks to all who have shared their thoughts and encouragement. You will be hearing from us as the Committee’s work proceeds.
Greg Avis ’80
Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Trustees
Seems like a good committee and a sensible process. Trustee Clayton Spencer ’77 is an especially good choice, given her insider’s knowledge of higher education. I certainly hope that there are some Ephs here who served on the last presidential search committee, but I don’t recall its exact membership.
More details below.
Cappy Hill ’76 is expected to be named the next president of the college within the next two months, definitely before the end of the academic year, according to a person familiar with the matter, who refused to be identified because the hope is to keep the appointment under wraps for the time being. We, of course, predicted this three weeks ago.
Catharine “Cappy” Hill ’76 will be the 17th President of Williams College. You read it here first. We need (or, the powers on the search committee will argue that we need) a quick hire, known to Williams, comfortable with our culture, and experienced with both leadership and hard economic choices. Cappy Hill fits those criteria perfectly.
Quick Hire: The financial crisis makes this the most dangerous era for Williams in a generation. We need new leadership and we need it now. Although it would be nice to conduct a nationwide search lasting a year or more, perhaps installing an interim President like Carl Vogt ’58 in 1999-2000, the College lacks the luxury of time. Hard choices must be made and the earlier they are made, the less damage to Williams. Although Morty will serve as a good steward for the next 9 months, he is in no position to demand sacrifices from various stakeholders nor to make promises as to future benefits. He is a lame duck, with at least one eye focused on his responsibilities at Northwestern. So, Greg Avis ’80 (chair of the executive board of the Trustees and of the Presidential Search Committee) will want to have the job filled no later than this summer. That means a fast search, with a preference for those candidates that Williams knows well already.
Known: Members of the search committee will know Cappy as well as they know virtually any other candidate. She is a Williams alum, a former faculty member and senior administrator. She was a finalist for the presidential search in 1999 that selected Morty. She is a known quantity. Select Cappy and there will be no surprises. The biggest mistake made by the Trustees in the last 20 years was the selection of Hank Payne. They won’t make an error like that again.
Comfortable: Cappy is as comfortable with the Williams ethos as anyone can be. One son is an alumnus and another is a current student! She knows what makes Williams tick, what makes it special. She bleeds purple. And she is a golfer! The greens of Taconic are calling . . .
Leadership: If you had to design the perfect President to lead Williams through a period of economic turmoil and difficult spending cuts, you would have two conflicting goals. First, you would want someone who knew Williams inside and out, who had served as Provost (more or less the chief financial officer of Williams) for many years. Second, you would want someone with experience outside of Williams, ideally someone who had already served as a college president, someone who has insider knowledge of how another elite liberal arts college prioritized its spending, ideally a less-rich college than Williams, a place that spent fewer dollars while providing the same quality education. Unfortunately, those two qualifications are almost never found together in one person, unless that person is named Cappy Hill.
1) Williams would not steal Cappy away from Vassar. Hah! Williams stole both John Chandler and Hank Payne from Hamilton without hesitation, after only 5 years in office. Indeed, Cappy is following precisely Chandler’s path of faculty member, department chair, senior administrator and then a different college presidency for seasoning. If Williams was willing to steal Chandler and Payne, we will steal Cappy. Her short tenure (3 years as of this summer) will make Greg Avis ’80 feel guilty, but only a little. His responsibility is to Williams.
2) Williams passed over Cappy once and will do so again. Perhaps. There was something that made Williams choose Morty over Cappy and maybe that something will happen again. But I doubt it. Being runner-up to Morty is still a good showing and her winning the Vassar job means that there was nothing substantively wrong with her application.
3) Williams may want Cappy but she will turn us down. Perhaps. Chair of the Vassar Board of Trustees William Plapinger should be a nervous man. He led the search committee that selected Cappy. He would hate to lose her. If he is smart, he is calling her right now, trying to (gently) pin her down on her future plans, double-checking that her committment to Vassar is as strong now as it was three years ago. He will not want to be so crass as to demand a promise from Cappy that she will remove herself from the Williams search, but he will strongly imply that it is unfair of her to expect him (and other senior trustees) to work hard on the current capital campaign unless she is fully committed to the future of Vassar. Luckily, Cappy is smart enough to put him off.
4) Cappy is a great candidate but there are a dozen others. True! There are many good candidates (and future posts will handicap the race) but none as perfect as Cappy. In fact, I can’t come up with anyone who comes close, at least according to the criteria I outline above. (Suggestions welcome!) She is an even money bet, at worst.
Allow me to be the first to welcome her back to Williams.
Upon the completion next summer of my ninth year as Williams president, I will be leaving to become president of Northwestern University.
This was not an easy decision for my family and me to make. Twenty of my thirty years in academe have been spent at Williams and I’ve loved virtually every minute. The past nine as president have been the greatest honor and privilege of my professional life. But with the completion of our comprehensive campaign this month and my strong feeling that institutions need new leadership every decade or so, I think the timing is right.
There’s much I still hope to do in these intervening months to help steer this place I love so deeply. Most importantly, with the support of the Board of Trustees, we are putting in place a financial plan that will assure that our college will be in a position to provide an exceptional educational experience for future students despite the current financial turmoil. Williams will emerge from the present challenges with its values intact and positioned to recapture its momentum.
Mimi and I have made many close friends at Williams — students, faculty, staff, alumni, and parents — and we hope that you will remain in our lives. When you visit us in Evanston, feel free to wear your traditional purple, a color that both institutions proudly share.
All the best,
Morton Owen Schapiro
Professor and President
(announcement from the Office of the President, posted on the Williams website on Dec. 16, 2008)
Many thanks to Chemistry Professor (and secretary of the presidential search committee 5 years ago) Hodge Markgraf ’52 for taking the time to answer some of my questions about the search process. Hodge pointed out that the search was thorough and professional. It involved a serious examiniation of 150 candidates, many telephone and in-person interviews, and meetings with the finalists by the full board of trustees.
Hodge was also kind enough to supply copies of many of the updates that Ray Henze ’74 (chair of the board of trustees at the time) sent to the entire community. (The College, or even WSO, really ought to archive documents like this in some public space. Future historians will thank you!)
Currently browsing posts filed under "Presidential Search"